Skip to main content

How short selling works

 


The big short is probably one of the most popular films on the topic of investing. It's a star-studded movie, that follows the real story of three groups of people who short or bet against the housing market for billions of dollars right before the 2008 real estate crisis. As you might expect our heroes end up making quite a bit of money. But how exactly does a short work?


 Well in the movie the positions are taken through what are known as swaps. A derivative agreement that is taken with the banks. But for common investors short positions typically involve individual stocks. Stocks make them easy enough to take but be warned: shorting comes with a lot of risks. on top of charging you expenses you don't normally see with standard investing, shorting also offers a skewed payoff where you face a limited upside in an uncapped downside. Meaning, you could lose an infinite amount of money theoretically anyway. So before you decide to short something let's go over the strategy in the risks involved.


Shorting also known as short selling is a trading strategy, where an investor sells a security today and buys it back in the future hoping that the price of the security will go down. It's effectively the opposite approach to a traditional long position, where investors buy today and sell at some point in the future to cash in hopefully, after the price has gone up. It follows the same buy low sell high mentality as long investing, but it just reverses the order of the motto. So investors sell high today and hope that the price will go down so they can buy low in the future.


 now shortening on a stock is a bit more complicated than going long on a position. So let's go through a running example to explain how the strategy works and the risks it poses. Imagine you have to investors who decide to take opposite positions in company X. The company stock currently has a market price of $10. investor A decides to buy 1,000 of these stocks thereby investing $10,000. One investor B decides to short 1,000 stocks thereby selling 10,000 dollars worth of the investment. 


Now I know what you're thinking how the hell do you sell a stock that you don't own. Well oftentimes the process involves selling a borrowed security. For example in a brokerage account you can often sell a position by borrowing a stock from your broker and then shorting. That way leaving you with the proceeds from the sale. The money you make from the sale obviously doesn't really belong to you since you sold someone else's stock to get it. But eventually when you buy the security back known as covering your short, you'll be able to return the stock and keep whatever money is left over which is how you profit from the trade. So going back to our example, if the stock price falls from $10 to $5 investor A will lose $5,000, one investor B will gain $5,000 since they'll be able to buy the stock back for a lower price and keep the remaining sales proceeds. On the other side of things if the stock price increases from ten to fifteen dollars investor A will be up five thousand dollars while investor B will be down five thousand. 


But this raises an interesting question. Up until this point investor B hasn't actually contributed any of their own money. So how is he going to buy back the stock for more money than what's in the account? Well this is where the concept of margins come into play. You see to short a position, an investor needs to post what's known as an initial margin. A 50% amount into their account to act as a buffer should the investment lose value. This means that investor B would have contributed five thousand dollars, of his own funds at the beginning of our example to accommodate for any losses. The amount still belongs to the investor, but it's held as collateral by the broker to ensure that investor B can afford to buy back the share in the future. Investor B will also be responsible for what are known as margin calls. A process that occurs when the margin becomes insufficient. For example in the event that the share price rises to $15, investor B would receive a margin call to replenish their cash buffer based on what's known as the maintenance margin, since there's no more wiggle room in the account to accommodate for further losses. 


So a big difference between shorting and going long a position is that you can only short in a margin account. While this has its downsides it does add leverage to the investors return. What do I mean by that?


Well let's go back to our example. Let's say that our share price falls from 10 to 5 dollars this would leave investor A to lose $5,000 and investor be to gain $5,000. On an absolute basis these returns equate one another, but on a percentage basis taking into account margins they're actually quite different. You see investor A has lost roughly 50% of their investment. But since investor B has only contributed five thousand dollars of his own money to this margin account, he's actually gained 100 percent of his investment doubled the percentage of investor A. Because borrowing is involved with shorting investor B will see his returns amplified. Though this goes both ways percentage losses in the short position will be double what they might have been for investor A. 


So will decline a 50% for investor a would translate into a one hundred percent decline for investor B. So short positions not only flip the percentage return received by investors, but they also amplify them both on the way up and the way down. But here's where we get into the distinct disadvantages of a short position. Namely short positions come with unique costs that a standard long investor won't face.


 For example if the stock you borrow pays a dividend, you'll actually need to pay this amount to your broker. meaning that, you'll face a cost equal to whatever dividend the stock pays. Short positions also charge investors in interest rate on the value of the stock you borrowed. After all since you are borrowing and selling someone else's security, you need to compensate them in the same way that you would compensate a bank with interest on a loan. typically the rate charge on a short position can range anywhere from 2.5 to 20 percent. but it can be higher for what are known as hard to borrow stocks. highly volatile or small cap positions.


 So needless to say shorting the stock can be quite a bit more expensive than a simple buy. But for the most part these expenses are fair. The interest makes sense since you are taking a leveraged position and since you are trying to inverse the return of a long position, it's only natural that you pay out the dividend received from the stock. But there are some absolute disadvantages involved with the short strategy. some of which may very well turn you off the idea of ever trying to short a stock.


 For one short strategies face what's known as buy-in risk. The chance that a broker will make you prematurely cover your position. This can occur for a number of reasons. A broker may need to return a stock to the portfolio they took it from or the stock may simply see a surge in demand. But the end result is that you may be forced to close your position at any time. This is a pretty significant drawback. especially, when it comes to waiting out market volatility. In our example perhaps investor B is confident that certain factors, whether it be regulation or technological change will cause the stock to crash in two years time. But if the price surges in the near term they may be forced to realize a loss even if they end up being right on top of this.


 When shorting a position you may experience what's known as a short squeeze. when a heavily shorted stock sees its price surge because the investors shorting the stock need to cover their position. Since investors who short sell have a appropriately shorter time horizon than long investors, this is a chance that they buy back the stock around the same time which can lead to a surge in the price and make it harder for you to cover your own position without realizing a loss. So as you can see there are some distinct disadvantages with shorting a position which alone may lead you to stay away.

 

But perhaps the biggest risk with short positions has to do with their skewed payoff. with her to investors longing in shorting the $10.00 stock, we face to risk reward profiles. On the one hand investor A can theoretically earn an infinitely high return the $10,000 investment and the ten dollar stock could double triple quadruple in value as the stock price climbs to 20, 30, $40 or higher. On the downside the most she can lose is the money she's invested the $10,000 which would only happen if the stock fell to 0 a pretty drastic outcome. Now investor B actually flips the risk reward here. If the stock drops down to 0 ignoring fees they can achieve a 200% return since they are able to keep the $10,000 your profits from their $5,000 investment. On the other hand if the stock instead climbs to 20, 30 $40 or higher they can lose 200, 400, 600 percent or more. 


This means that you can lose a lot more money than what you've initially invested. and indeed, this very feature has had devastating impacts on the investors. This is why many investors tend to stick with long lonely positions. For many investors the return is simply not worth the risk. And on top of the fact that you're going against the natural upward bias of stocks you're more or less betting against a company that is actively trying to prove you wrong.


 Short selling certainly does play an important role in the world of investments and indeed you can make a lot of money by placing the short bet against a deteriorating stock. But if you're looking to speculate with short selling, tread lightly. you may end up buying off a lot more than you can chew.


Thanks a bunch for reading.let me know about the topics you want me to write about in the comments below.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Active versus passive investing

   Are you an active investor? You think you can invest better than the markets? Over time everyone knows that active mutual funds on average underperform index funds. wait! you invest passively? only a dummy brain would think that the markets are fully efficient. maybe that's taking it too far. Chances are if you don't get the joke I'm making here, you haven't seen investors Duke it out in the active versus passive debate because my god it can get heated.  While most investors agree that investing is fundamental to personal finance. They can't seem to agree on the best approach. On the one end you have being come into active investors, believe that passive investors to be lazy blind to the irregularities at the market and on the other passive investors decry the high fees and arrogance of the active crowd. But while it's easy to make fun of the argument, it is important to understand the differences in the two strategies so that you can decide your own approach...

Share buybacks - good and bad Explained

    Whether you've just started investing or you've been in it for a while, you've probably heard at one point or another about the share buyback. An activity companies carry out to return their profits to investors. On the surface, it probably seems like a simple enough mechanic. I mean the name itself seems to tell you all that you need to know. But buybacks carry many implications for those invested in the company.  In some circumstances, the process can benefit shareholders and it's a great and fairly efficient way for a company, to pay out its earnings to those invested in the firm. In others it actually destroys shareholder value and can be used to manipulate accounting figures, to boost executive pay. clearly, it's a more complicated and controversial topic than you might have expected. In fact, we've even seen American banks banned from carrying out buybacks by the u.s federal reserve during this pandemic. so what is the share buyback? what does it mean ...